People like – or dislike – words for the way they sound or the associations they conjure, but some are also influenced by the way a word looks.
For example, many find something humorous about the letter k.
Pickle. Dunk. Monkey. Kalamazoo. Yank.
Funniest is the initial silent k, as in
knackwrust or
knuckle. What is so funny about that? I don’t know, but there’s an air of stupidity about it, no? To get really stupid, when someone wants to make a joke of his shop, he screws the spelling to include k: Kwik Kleaners or Kute Gifts. Poor k!
I like a doubled vowel, as in
leer and
deep. Even better than the double e is double o. To some extent, it’s also funny. Think of the word
tube. It’s not funny. But the word
loop is. Since
tube and
loop have the same vowel, it’s not sound here, it’s spelling. Other double o’s are also funny, like
doodle, toot, boob, poodle and
oodles. And why is
cartoon not
cartune? Because!
You’d think double o words were formed for the sake of a laugh. But there’s another class of double o words that ooze of mystery and have nothing funny about them. Think
room. Such a big little word. Also
smooth and
broom and
groom.
Cocoon. Soundwise, it helps if the double o is followed by a vocalized consonant. But it isn’t absolutely necessary. I find a weird spaciousness also in
root and
soot, for example, and
soot isn’t even pronounced with the long /u/.
Somewhere the buried knowledge of how the word is spelled affects me even when I’m neither reading nor writing it. As much as I dig
root,
route leaves me lukewarm. And while I like
June, pursuit, newt and
chute, they’d be different altogether with a double o.
One might say it’s only because the double o looks so cool. But that’s not it entirely. Also
leer is more interesting than, say,
near.
Wheel is more intriguing than
weal, and
between would beat
betwene, even though there’s something sweet about the latter. Dopey and sweet.